Kolkata witnessed its first Beef Festival in April last year at an academic space but it went largely unmarked, without any newspaper reports or sensational controversies. The uber cool Bengali middle class which flaunts its progressivism by gobbling plate after plate of beef steak too stayed away. What is so explosively political about a Beef Festival celebrating the declaration of Ambedkar’s birthday as a national holiday that efforts had to be put in to invisibilise it? Finds out Drishadwati Bargi.
“Their doings are not our doings. Their being is not our being. But we can eat what they say with a hearty reassurance of our material and symbolic profit, for what could be more politically correct than reading the wonderful protest literature produced by all these groups of people who have been oppressed and deprived and under-privileged through all those uncountable centuries? We could now begin to undo the sins of our ancestors, it seems by reading and praising Dalit poetry. Only so long as we are not forced to eat with them, or marry our daughter to one of them.”
Jaware Aniket, “Eating and Eating with the Dalit”
Aniket Jaware’s skeptical remark sounds counter-intuitive at a time when Dalit literature and anti-caste writings are gradually making their way into mainstream literary establishments and institutions. However, it throws the gauntlet at the contemporary liberals who have started consuming, circulating and publishing Dalit literature with the zeal of a revolutionary. Moreover, it is particularly apt in encapsulating the predicament of the bhadrolok (read upper caste, propertied ) society of Kolkata which continues to consider itself the harbinger of modernity and radicalism. Thus, when the Ambedkarite students(Georgy,Vikas, Richa, Santosh, Swathy, Gita) at the Centre for Studies In Social Sciences, Patuli organise a Beef festival in order to celebrate the declaration of Babasaheb’s birthday as a national holiday, they confront unenthusiastic classmates and hostile non teaching staff. The former group includes Bengali Dalit students (noted for their invisibility), armchair Maoist sympathisers who believe in class struggle and hence have no faith in anti –caste politics and the absent students and teachers of Jadavpur University (CSSS being affiliated to Jadavpur).One must mention here that the faculty of CSSS supported the festival and participated in the exhibition. The non teaching staff resisted and prevented the cooking of the inside the canteen because it is presumably a “ non Hindu food” and it cannot be cooked in a “Hindu institution”. The secularism that middle class Bengalis have been so proud of turned out to be a veneer that fell off when the non teaching staff said that from the following year they would definitely organise Saraswati puja in reaction to the festival.
For a bhadro-Dalit woman like this scribe, who was initiated to beef by two caste proud baidya Bengali men, the festival offered an opportunity to be part of the Ambedkarite movement. As I chatted with the students about the festival, browsed the anti caste cartoons of Shyamsundar, the photographs commemorating important events of Dalit history, read the protest poetry of Rajkumar, Siddalingaiah and Kalekkuru Prasad I confronted, perhaps for the first time the presence of active Ambedkarite politics in an institution and how the Dalit and non Dalit students living outside WB have absorbed it into their very existence. This is not passive devotionalism. Rather, this is an act of claiming the institution, thereby inscribing in it the facticity of Dalit experience which is symbolized by beef. The statement needs elaboration.
Claiming the institution
When Georgy and Vikas arrived at the CSSS from Hyderabad to pursue their Ph.D and M.Phil degrees respectively, two things surprised them. Inspite of being the birthplace of the Subaltern Studies, the CSSS has not a single Dalit in the Faculty. Secondly, they also noted that the institution does not follow the rules of affirmative action in the admission of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe students. When the boys approached the teachers , the familiar argument over merit followed. What was more disappointing was the fact that inspite of its international fame, it has remained isolated from the surrounding neighbourhood. The students discovered a hostel for Poundra Kshatriya ( a Dalit caste) men, some fifteen minutes from the institute and went to invite them to the festival. To their dismay, inspite of being a caste conscious Ambedkarite organisation, the men at the Poundra Kshatriya hostel were not aware of the existence of the Centre. One of the festival’s aim was also to counter the insularity of the institution. Vikas pointed out that when the Beef Festival was organised at Osmania University, the opposition came from the faculty as well as students. The fierce opposition led to the arrival of police and the festival made it to the headlines. Ironically, the festival got some visibility due to the opposition. In Kolkata, more insidious forms of censorship are practised. When the organisers informally spoke with some of the journalists working with different newspapers of the city, they hardly showed any interest. Since I was also promoting the event via Facebook, I noticed that the interest mainly came from students living outside Kolkata . The habitual beef eaters bypassed the event. Perhaps they were ashamed of eating beef minus the cosmopolitan aura surrounding it. When made part of Ambedkarite politics, beef no longer remains just the food to be consumed and gorged on but a resistance to be confronted.
This weird phenomenon of bhadrolok doublespeak cannot be understood without looking at the historical role the bhadrolok has played in Bengal politics, thanks to the thirty four years of Leftist rule. It is not that the previous governments gave space to Dalits or Muslims, who are equally invisible in West Bengal. But the Left Front rule , with its focus on social change created a vanguard out of the bhadrolok who successfully pre empted any challenge from below. Appointing themselves as the liberators of the masses , they ended up representing the latter not only in politics but also in culture. The representation has lead to abstraction of concrete lived realities thereby ignoring factors of caste, gender, sexuality or ethnicity. As a result any politics that brings up these structures of oppression faces strong resistance. For instance, it is extremely common for people who attempt to talk about caste to encounter the assertion that it is not caste but class that is the chief cause of oppression in WB. The assertion has now taken the form of fact, given the dominance of the bhadrolok in the cultural and educational sphere thereby preventing alternative /Dalit epistemologies to emerge. For instance, take the case of Jadavpur University where I study. It is not that students do not face casteist remarks or abuses. Teachers holding degrees from prestigious universities do not hesitate to jeer at students with non Brahminical surnames. Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe students face ridicule from the administrative staff. On the one hand, there is a minuscule number of Dalits in the faculty .On the other, such is the dominance of Left leaning intellectuals on campus that students who want to work on caste in Bengal would normally find little encouragement. In one of the interviews, when I expressed my desire to work on Dalits in WB, I was told that there aren’t any in WB! This extreme reluctance to perceive the Scheduled Caste population of Bengal as Dalits stems from a paternalistic impulse of the upper caste intelligentsia. By claiming the Dalit identity , which had its origin in Maharashtra, the Dalits in Bengal are severing their ties with the bhadrolok led movements of Bengal and to make matters worse acknowledging their allegiance with “non-Bengalis”!The gesture resists Bengali chauvinism and brahminism in the same vein. It is important to point out that brahminism is inbuilt within the construction of Bengali identity. One simply has to look back at the literature of swadeshi period when Bengali identity was being politicized by the bhadrolok. Jati or caste (read anti caste assertions by Dalits) came to be seen as hindrance to a Bengali identity and the bhadrolok replaced it with the idea of a Bengali jati created, led and defined by the caste Hindu male. For instance, Nazrul’s famous song Jater namey bajjati shab, popularized during the swadeshi period laments this division of caste only because it leads to disunity among Bengalis.
Jater name bajjati shab, Wiles in the name of jati (caste)
Jaat jalia khelcho jua you are swindling with your jati(caste)
Chule porei jaat jabe if mere touch destroys jati(caste)
Jaat cheler hather noi toh moa jati (caste ) is nothing more than a child’s toy/candy
Hukhor jal aar bhater hari, Hukah’s water and rice from the pot,
Bhabli etei jatir jan you thought jati (caste) thrives on these!
Tai toh bekub korli tora Fool! That’s the reason why you broke
Ek jatike ekshokhan ; one jati( Bengali nationality) into hundred
Akhon dekhish bharot jora Now , throughout Bharat
Pore achish bashi mora , rotten corpses lie scattered
jat nai aaj ache shudhu No jati (caste as well as nation) lives today …..
Jaat sheyaler hukka hua. (an approximate translation)
Beef and Facticity of dalit experience
In his essay The Origin Of Untouchability , B.R Ambedkar argued that beef eating by the Dalits is the reason for their untouchability. In his understanding, given the shastric sanctions against beef, beef is the reason why caste Hindus hate Dalits . Since beef is the cheapest of all available meat, the centrality of it as the main source of diet in Dalits’ life is only natural. However, what is more important is the symbolic import of consuming beef by those Dalits who can afford to have other meat and yet are claiming beef within the institution. At a time when the Hindutva brigade’s arrival is all set, claiming to be a beef eater is not just a claim not to be Hindu but a move that seeks identification with the Muslims. It directly assaults the myth of the Hindu nation, given the strategic importance of Dalits in BJP’s communal pogroms, (the Dalits have been co opted into its Hindutva politics .For instance it is said that the first brick at the Ayodhya temple was laid by a Dalit after the demolition of Babri Masjid by the BJP-RSS combined forces. The 6th December 1992 riot was strategically organized, among other reasons, to prevent a huge gathering of Dalits in Mumbai to commemorate Ambedkar’s death.) In this scenario, beef is an assertion of the autonomy of the Dalit community, it is its’ refusal to be identified as Hindus. In the light of Ambedkarite thought to be a Hindu, is also to have a caste. One can become casteless only when one renounces the religion, which according to him is no more than a system of codes and laws. It is due to the centrality of Dalits in maintaining the dominance of Hindu religion that the Ambedkarite Beef Festival made the fissures so prominent. The meat could only be cooked outside the kitchen as the non teaching staff would not tolerate the touch of beef. Surprisingly that day, the usual ceramic cups were not available and tea was being served in use and throw plastic cups .
Beyond the Festival : Dalit cultural assertion
If the Beef Festival was intended to disrupt the religious conservatism of the Bengalis, the exhibition of Shyamsundar’s cartoons, highlighting caste in the academia, cross caste amorous relationships, Ambedkar’s role in the history of modern India, photographs of Dalit public protesting against the state or celebrating the erection of Ambedkar’s statues and most importantly books by Bengali Dalit writers challenged the Brahminical pedagogy of the institution. Georgy and Vikasrepeatedly said that there is a reluctance among the faculty to look at caste from an Ambedkarite perspective .The objectivity and theoretical excellence for which the centre stands , turns out to be a hindrance for researchers who want to look at caste from an Ambedkarite perspective. The loopholes came out very recently when Dalit writers like Manohar Mouli Biswas and Manoranjan Byapari got invited at the Centre to share their perspectives on caste. In spite of the faculty’s engagement, the students were found sneering at the speakers, laughing at their accent and opinion. The point I am trying to make is that even the so called meritocratic students who have fed into the discourse of SS have not learned to listen to the subaltern inspite of their anti elitist claims. The fact that one has to question one’s basic assumptions, to shake the very foundations of one’s zealously guarded values in order to enter into a fruitful conversation with the “other” has not gone down well with most of the students. That is the reason why upper caste Bengalis do not even question the fact that in their denial of existence of caste in Bengal, it is their sense of superiority they are defending.
The beginning of a movement
Perhaps for the first time in the history of Kolkata, anti caste protest got a space to express itself within an institution. A quick survey of the social networking site reveals that it has successfully provoked bhadrolok sensibility. A fierce assertion of “class” has been made with the lamentation that caste is being given greater importance than class in the academia! While the irony of the statement is all too palpable to be further talked about, the fact remains that caste has been invisibilised through such assertions. The festival has offered an opportunity to break the silence surrounding caste. Let students of other institutions draw inspiration from the event .
(Drishadwati Bargi is an M.Phil student at the School of Women’s Studies, Jadavpur University)
Gargi
As much as I can’t help appreciating the logical tone of the article, I – as a Bhodrolok Brahmin (nee Baidya) Bangali – have a few questions for the author.
1. It is common knowledge that Dalits outside (and inside) of Bengal have far more pressing matters to think about than ‘celebrating’ Beef. Why is it then that the ‘educated and upwardly mobile’ Dalits should internalize and elitize (although there’s no such word, I thought this slight distortion would give a clear indication of the point I am trying to make) a much bigger problem into something as prosaic as a ‘beef festival’ at an academic institution not getting enough attention from the media and receiving the cold shoulder from ‘habitual beef eaters’ among Bhadroloks (also, in my opinion the Bhadroloks are more of habitual pork eaters)?
2. The author seems to notice that the ‘generally secular and liberal Middle Class Bengali’ (perhaps) distanced themselves from the festival owing to its political angle. This, the author interprets, as ‘double standard’. The question here is, why must food be politicised? And with all due respect, Dalit food is certainly not ONLY about beef. Sure, socio-political-economical identity of an entire community is important. But, how is that cause being addressed with a beef festival in an niche institute? In the end, it was just another needless, irrelevant, politically-hued activity begging to be noticed and create controversies without serving any purpose (other than start a slew of ‘discourses’ by ‘intellectuals’ just for the heck of it) to the Dalits as a whole.
3. I am sure all of us have to face jeers and remarks (some in good humor, some in bad taste) irrespective of the class or caste we belong to. Professors (and fellow students) taking pot shots at funny surnames surely isn’t a personal and/or elitist attack on Dalit students? Or I might be making light of the matter considering I’ve always been a part of the ‘Bhadrolok’ community.
4. Lastly, I am curious to know. Just how much of a caste divide is there in Bengal as compared to other parts of the country? For instance, I haven’t heard of lower castes having different water wells or eating leftover Brahmin food even in the remotest villages of Bengal. Also, are Dalit/lower caste food habits distinctly different from that of the upper caste (in terms of items and ingredients, not quality or quantity)? I don’t seem to find anything remarkably different. If I am not much mistaken, beef is perhaps not the mainstay of Dalits in Bengal either. So the belief that the terms ‘Bhadrolok’ and ‘Chotolok’ largely define class (and not caste) difference isn’t entirely unfounded. Is it?
I do not at all mean to say that ‘caste’ is non-existent in Bengal. A Banerjee Motheri-n -Law would prefer a Mukherjee Daughter-in-Law over a Mondal or even a Bose! All I am trying to say is Dalits (or SCs) in Bengal are still better placed than their brethren in the rest of the country. All this righteous angst the Bhandralok, in this context, seems a little too exaggerated.