Case 1: I was attending a public talk a few weeks ago at the India International Centre in Delhi, when I noticed something extremely curious. The talk was supposed to discuss the future of the humanities, both as a discipline and as a pedagogical practice. It generally happens with academic conferences that too many metaphors spoil the broth. Nonetheless, I went with a bloated sense of hope and a hidden admiration for the speakers who were internationally recognised scholars.
The talk progressed and the three professors placed their opinions across the table. Two of them were impressive, conservatively erudite. The other professor (let’s call her Prof A), who, unlike the other two, happens to teach at a public university, spoke of a terrible crisis at the heart of the institution that is the humanities and its close corollary: intellectual freedom. She was the only one on the panel to speak of humanities as a discipline that can be dangerous. The Janus-faced freedom that we have been granted by the authorities was stark in its obscenity and futility in her point. She was the only person who talked about student movements happening across the country, from Shimla to FTII to Presidency and Jadavpur University.
What was even more surprising that one of the other professors (Prof B), who is at the helm of a private university, spoke about a detailed interdisciplinary and career-oriented approach and his fellowship intending to produce Indians who are successful in creating communicative patterns and breaking entrepreneurial borders. It was difficult to comprehend why he didn’t even try to engage with Prof A’s concerns about the danger looming large over institutions that provide fearless knowledge. It should be kept in mind that Dr Kalburgi had been murdered a couple of days before this, and Prof A had spoken about it. Nobody in the audience asked a question about this, and Prof A seemed shocked at how the whole discussion boiled down to mundane career alternatives and insipid jokes about a “Taiwanese girlfriend”, which was the example used by Prof B to hint at the globality that his students achieve through the fellowship.
It should be kept in mind that Dr Kalburgi had been murdered a couple of days before this, and Prof A had spoken about it. Nobody in the audience asked a question about this, and Prof A seemed shocked at how the whole discussion boiled down to mundane career alternatives and insipid jokes about a “Taiwanese girlfriend”.
Case 2: A head of department in another public university refused to lend a classroom for a reading group session. Why? Because it was a ‘queer studies group’. Simple and uncomplicated in its absurdity.
Case 3: Again, the venue was the India International Center, where Akshaya Mukul’s Gita Press and the Making of Hindu India was being launched. The discussion that followed was all about causalities and affects and direct confrontations. There was no attempt to unearth the ghosts of modern India and its discontents. There was no understanding of the nuanced version of politics.
There were apologists for different parties along with a distinguished scholar who desperately attempted to engage with a slightly different and fruitful version of what was happening. There was Mani Shankar Aiyar, Sitaram Yechury, Urvashi Butalia and Chandan Mitra. It turned out to be a political slugfest with Mr Mitra showing that even his Oxford education didn’t allow him to decolonise his mind off what is crude Hindutva politics. Yechury was no better, still wallowing about the yesteryears of Marxism lost in textbooks of political studies. (Also, his jokes and one-liners were not funny.) Polite, suave and clever, Aiyar picked up passages from the text and demonstrated how the BJP-Hindutva nexus is evil and in an almost Marxian way, suggested that we should exorcise this demon.
It turned out to be a political slugfest with Mr Mitra showing that even his Oxford education didn’t allow him to decolonise his mind off what is crude Hindutva politics. Yechury was no better, still wallowing about the yesteryears of Marxism lost in textbooks of political studies.
Nobody talked anything else. Mitra talked about his party politics and ghar wapsi as a benevolent process, Yechuri talked about Seeta and Geeta jokes and Aiyar about the secularisation of modern India. At the end I was feeling sorry for the author Akshaya Mukul and Urvashi Butalia and the moderator, but then they knew what they were walking into. Anyway, the kebabs were pretty good!
What is the similarity between these three cases, two of them considerably serious, pointing towards a deeper psychological inadequacy in society, and the other a sign of personal prejudice? All of them are absurd incongruities that should not exist in academic spaces.
They should shock us. They don’t. Dr Kalburgi’s death didn’t shock us; the misrepresentation of protesting Presidency students in national dailies didn’t shock us; the ghettoisation of education and subsequent saffronisation didn’t shock us; Radhe Ma’s antics didn’t shock us; hell, even Narendra Modi’s usage of the word ‘ideology’ at the Global Hindu-Buddhist Initiative on Conflict Avoidance and Environmental Consciousness on 3 September didn’t shock us.
The intellectual is what he does. His identity as an intellectual is formed by the actions he undertakes, by the strategies he employs and—to an extent—the tools he makes use of.
So, what is the role of the intellectual today? What is the definition of ‘intellectual’? I don’t think the two questions can be separated. The intellectual is what he does. His identity as an intellectual is formed by the actions he undertakes, by the strategies he employs and—to an extent—the tools he makes use of. What I can assert that the intellectual cannot be non-political. He could be apolitical, in a different sense of the term. But he is always already political. He cannot be otherwise.
When it comes to thinking about intellectuals, two or three contemporary theories come to mind. Gramsci makes a distinction between what he terms as a traditional intellectual and organic intellectual. Traditional intellectuals are in a way non-partisan, and rise above contextual issues to raise questions about meta-issues like Truth or Reason or God, for that matter. Organic intellectuals are representatives of specific groups and proponents of what we might call minority interests.
What is truly intriguing is the manner in which these two categories interact or even engage with other. Can we even sustain this distinction in the contemporary world? In this world of simulacrum, where would we find such an ethical politics?
The intellectual cannot be non-political. He could be apolitical, in a different sense of the term. But he is always already political. He cannot be otherwise.
The second comes from an amorphously defined non-Marxian philosopher. Foucault talks about a new position that the intellectual has to take in order to expose certain presumptions or pre-sanctioned truths that society has organised around the capillary nodes of power. The intellectual has to explode this power-knowledge nexus and its ensuing hegemony and try to revive an alternate regime of alternate truisms. He bridges the gap somewhat between the Gramscian categories.
In a slight deviation from what Foucualt must have meant, we could talk of Zygmunt Bauman, who understands that the authorial position the intellectual occupies might be problematic and hence proposes the role of the intellectual as the “interpreter” across texts/disciplines rather than a “man talking to men” situation. What Bauman doesn’t realise, however, is that a disinterestedness of sorts creeps into his definition of what an intellectual is. Edward Said has advocated that the intellectual has to employ a position of alterity to question the State in whatever capacity he can.
However, the multifarious nature of world politics probably doesn’t allow us the scope of an universal intellectual to engage with every hegemonic issue that’s out there. Rather, there has to be a steady flow of specific intellectuals, who I would rather call workers, who will work/engage with different minority groups, sexuality issues, class problems, race identity and try to bring possibilities of resistance. Mere interpretation won’t save us anymore.
There has to be a steady flow of specific intellectuals, who I would rather call workers, who will work/engage with different minority groups, sexuality issues, class problems, race identity and try to bring possibilities of resistance. Mere interpretation won’t save us anymore.
What we need is a conscious interactive politics that goes beyond the classroom. Radical politics has to be worked out on the streets and corners of the world. The North-South divide or the problems of the refugees can no longer be dealt with in administrative meetings. We have to open ourselves to the “other”, invite him/her, take care of her and maybe understand that our identity is formed through our interaction with this other that we have rejected time and again. It’s time to take a risk. It’s time to be hospitable. It’s time to couple politics with ethics, and think about the aesthetics of everyday politics that is not fought in administrative buildings but rather savagely out there in the streets.
fdertol mrtokev
Wow, awesome blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is excellent, let alone the content!
slot mahjong
Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and all. Nevertheless think of if you added some great photos or videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and clips, this blog could undeniably be one of the most beneficial in its niche. Amazing blog!
gelatin trick
F*ckin’ remarkable things here. I’m very glad to see your post. Thanks a lot and i am looking forward to contact you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?
kursi kuliah
I like the efforts you have put in this, thanks for all the great articles.
gelatin trick
I saw a lot of website but I conceive this one has got something extra in it in it
lavanderia
This design is steller! You certainly know how to keep a reader amused. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Fantastic job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too cool!
gelatin trick
you’ve an incredible blog here! would you like to make some invite posts on my blog?
pcxwin
Great write-up, I’m regular visitor of one’s web site, maintain up the excellent operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a lengthy time.
gelatin trick recipe
I admire your piece of work, appreciate it for all the useful content.
iblbet
Great, I should definitely pronounce, impressed with your site. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, web site theme . a tones way for your client to communicate. Nice task.
togel
I am extremely impressed with your writing talents as well as with the layout in your weblog. Is that this a paid topic or did you customize it yourself? Anyway stay up the nice quality writing, it is uncommon to look a great weblog like this one these days..
gelatin trick
I’ll immediately snatch your rss feed as I can’t to find your e-mail subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Please permit me recognise in order that I may just subscribe. Thanks.
gelatin trick recipe
I used to be recommended this blog by my cousin. I’m not positive whether or not this post is written via him as nobody else know such designated approximately my difficulty. You are amazing! Thanks!
betspin138
I’m extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to see a nice blog like this one today..
link gacor
Definitely believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the web the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people think about worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks
poolplanen shop
Your place is valueble for me. Thanks!…
Mat de yoga
Hello.This article was extremely motivating, particularly since I was looking for thoughts on this subject last Monday.
slot gacor
Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your weblog? My website is in the very same niche as yours and my users would certainly benefit from a lot of the information you present here. Please let me know if this ok with you. Many thanks!
ghdrol
I was studying some of your articles on this internet site and I conceive this web site is very instructive! Continue posting.
ghdrol
Thanks for some other informative web site. Where else may I get that kind of info written in such a perfect manner? I have a undertaking that I’m simply now operating on, and I’ve been on the glance out for such info.
gelatin trick
Hello there! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I truly enjoy reading through your posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same subjects? Thanks!
omaslot
Regards for helping out, excellent information. “Job dissatisfaction is the number one factor in whether you survive your first heart attack.” by Anthony Robbins.
mega888
I appreciate, cause I found exactly what I was looking for. You have ended my 4 day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye
the brain song
Its superb as your other content : D, thankyou for posting.
daftar susterslot
Somebody essentially help to make seriously posts I would state. This is the first time I frequented your web page and thus far? I amazed with the research you made to create this particular publish extraordinary. Great job!
burnslim review
Really clean internet site, regards for this post.
iblbet
I gotta favorite this website it seems very beneficial very useful
streamate alejandramartinezz
Wow that was odd. I just wrote an extremely long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn’t show up. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that over again. Regardless, just wanted to say wonderful blog!
slot resmi quiz4d
My wife and i got very joyful Chris could carry out his researching from the precious recommendations he grabbed when using the site. It’s not at all simplistic to just possibly be giving freely tactics which often most people might have been selling. We realize we have you to thank for that. The specific illustrations you have made, the simple site navigation, the relationships you can aid to create – it’s all wonderful, and it is letting our son in addition to the family understand the theme is awesome, which is very essential. Thank you for the whole lot!
pink gelatin trick recipe
I went over this site and I believe you have a lot of excellent info, saved to favorites (:.
gelatin trick
you have an excellent weblog right here! would you wish to make some invite posts on my blog?
iptv no fire stick
Thanx for the effort, keep up the good work Great work, I am going to start a small Blog Engine course work using your site I hope you enjoy blogging with the popular BlogEngine.net.Thethoughts you express are really awesome. Hope you will right some more posts.
arialief
I couldn’t resist commenting
eva bloom
This really answered my problem, thank you!
dubai wealth secret
I do like the manner in which you have framed this particular matter plus it does give me a lot of fodder for consideration. However, coming from just what I have seen, I simply just trust as the comments pack on that people today remain on point and in no way embark on a tirade associated with some other news of the day. All the same, thank you for this fantastic point and even though I can not really concur with the idea in totality, I respect the point of view.
arialief
I like what you guys are up also. Such clever work and reporting! Carry on the superb works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my web site :)
eva bloom
I was reading some of your articles on this site and I conceive this site is really instructive! Retain putting up.
prodentim
I do love the manner in which you have framed this specific concern plus it really does supply me personally a lot of fodder for consideration. On the other hand, because of everything that I have seen, I only hope as the opinions pile on that men and women keep on point and not embark upon a tirade involving the news of the day. Anyway, thank you for this excellent piece and though I can not concur with it in totality, I regard the viewpoint.
prodentim
Yay google is my world beater helped me to find this outstanding web site! .
private alphard airport transfer klia
Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch as I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!
exotic car rental malaysia
I don’t even know the way I stopped up here, but I believed this submit was once good. I do not know who you are but definitely you’re going to a well-known blogger if you are not already ;) Cheers!
anti-aging stem cell clinic kl
You have mentioned very interesting details ! ps nice internet site.